Exercise Caution: Fitness Certificates and Medico Legal Risks
03 Dec 2013
Case history
The patient needed a “fitness certificate” to be completed by a doctor before joining the local fishing club. Questions included whether the patient could safely tolerate the following situations:
• Spine: able to tolerate brief impacts through the spine when sitting in a boat at sea.
• Cardiovascular: able to outswim a great white shark over 100 metres and re-enter a boat.
Discussion
A “fitness certificate” involves a doctor providing a medical clearance that certifies a patient is physically able to perform specific activities or jobs. Such certificates involve assessing the risk of an adverse outcome, taking into account a patient’s physical function and health status. This must then be weighed against the physicality of the planned activity, including an understanding of the likely intensity, duration and frequency of the activity.
However, this information will usually not be available to the doctor and may be under (or outside) the control of the requesting party. Appropriate assessment by the doctor may be impractical, impossible, or overly onerous.
Fitness certificates may also expose a doctor to claims or complaints where harm arises in relation to the patient’s participation in the activity if this risk has not been properly assessed. Complaints may also arise where a doctor refuses to complete the request.
The request for a medical clearance is often an attempt by the requesting party to shift their legal liability to the doctor, where normally the requesting party has a responsibility to appropriately implement reasonable risk management policies and procedures.
Dealing with fitness certificate requests
Arguably, where a doctor has received an appropriate fee and patient consent, they have an ethical obligation to provide factual information required by the requesting party. However, this does not imply that the doctor must follow the format of the request and/or provide their opinion.
Under the Medical Board of Australia’s Code of Conduct (at 8.8 – Medical reports, certificates and giving evidence), a doctor has an obligation to be honest, accurate, and to take reasonable steps to verify the content of a report and not deliberately omit relevant information.
MDA National’s advice is to provide the requesting party with a relevant factual health summary including clinical information such as past history, co-morbidities, physical limitations and medications. Relevant negatives may also be significant (e.g. patient has not undertaken cardiac stress testing). Future management plans such as referrals and further testing should be included.
A request by a patient to deliberately omit relevant information should result in the doctor declining to assist. Opinions may be provided where the doctor is comfortable that these opinions are supported by appropriate facts and the doctor has relevant expertise. Otherwise leave such questions blank or suggest where further information might be obtained.
Sometimes it will be necessary to provide a referral to another health practitioner or other fitness assessor for further review. This may include medical referrals (e.g. stress tests, Occupational Health Physicians) or referrals to allied health providers (e.g. Accredited Exercise Physiologists, Physiotherapists) with specific expertise in this area.
Fitness certificates allow the requesting party to decide whether the patient is suitable for the task at hand or whether risk modification can be undertaken by the patient or the requesting party. It also allows the requesting party to seek further specific information where necessary.
Members seeking advice can contact our Medico-legal Advisory Service on 1800 011 255
or email advice@mdanational.com.au.
Summary points
- You do not need to answer every question or follow the format of the request. You should provide any information that you consider is relevant.
- Information provided might include a health summary, past history, co-morbidities, physical limitations, medications and future management plans.
- If necessary, refer the patient to other fitness assessors or health practitioners with specific expertise in this area for further review.
- Be honest and accurate in your response. Only include information that you can verify and do not deliberately omit relevant information. If the patient requests you to omit relevant information, you may decline to complete the request.
Doctors Let's Talk: Get Yourself A Fricking GP
Get yourself a fricking GP stat! is a conversation with Dr Lam, 2019 RACGP National General Practitioner of the Year, rural GP and GP Anesthetics trainee, that explores the importance of finding your own GP as a Junior Doctor.
25 Oct 2022
Systematic efforts to reduce harms due to prescribed opioids – webinar recording
Efforts are underway across the healthcare system to reduce harms caused by pharmaceutical opioids. This 43-min recording of a live webinar, delivered 11 March 2021, is an opportunity for prescribers to check, and potentially improve, their contribution to these endeavours. Hear from an expert panel about recent opioid reforms by the Therapeutic Goods Administration and changes to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.
14 May 2021
Diplomacy in a hierarchy: tips for approaching a difficult conversation
Have you found yourself wondering how to broach a tough topic of conversation? It can be challenging to effectively navigate a disagreement with a co-worker, especially if they're 'above' you; however, it's vital for positive team dynamics and safe patient care. In this recording of a live webinar you'll have the opportunity to learn from colleagues' experiences around difficult discussions and hear from a diverse panel moderated by Dr Kiely Kim (medico-legal adviser and general practitioner). Recorded live on 2 September 2020.
05 Oct 2020
